I don't just rate software because I like something or haven't used others, I do test it and compare completely before judging any software and ran this 3 times to be sure. Is it still better than using Windows basic copy? By all means and would definitely recommend using it over that but there are far better out there. I do personally find the speed an issue, especially as much copying as I do and large amounts, this makes a major over all difference, ESPECIALLY if I want to copy files for backing up someone's system and they need it yesterday.Īnother thing is, in order to get more options,you have to buy the pro version, others have plenty of options for FREE and have error checking and more than TeraCopy offers, that being said, I find no way to rate a software higher which has less features, even in the paid for version with others doing a better job and are completely free, not free versions. I tested 12 gigs of files in a folder on my Kingston SSD drive, compared to Windows basic copy, and 3 other file copy softwares and again, I was disappointed in TeraCopy.Īnd if that wasn't enough, Windows basic copy beat it with 3 min 20 sec. When an issue comes up, TeraCopy wont terminate a transfer like Windows Explorer does. It's been a while since I've used TeraCopy so I thought, eh, give it another chance and seeing the high reviews I just had to test it again. Also available for Linux and Mac and as portable Windows app.
0 kommentar(er)
